Skip to main content

Robots, Your Job, and the Future

On Twitter, I often link to articles about how robots are replacing humans in various jobs. This isn't something I like talking about. It's terrible for those being replaced. But it is a fact, and that's why I do it.

We are in the early stages of a radical change in how companies provide services and produce or sell goods. It is scary for workers, but the change has started, and it's not going to stop, and if you can be replaced by a robot, you will be.

Those people protesting outside McDonald's headquarters in Chicago, wanting a $15/hour minimum wage and the right to unionize? They're organizing battles in a war they've already lost. McDonald's isn't going to give you $15/hour. McDonald's will just replace you with robots, and it's already working on it.

(Frankly, the Chicago protesters strike me as more of a union-thing, more union power, more mandatory union dues, etc. But unions will decline as their members are replaced by robots. Of course, in 2012, unions killed the Hostess company, causing the loss of 18,000 jobs.)

Or let's say you get states to raise the minimum wage to $15/hour. Illinois or any state can force McDonald's to pay you $15/hour; but Illinois can't force McDonald's to keep unprofitable restaurants open. McDonald's can just close all of its restaurants in Illinois. How does that help you? You just went from $9.00/hour to no job.

Once rumblings started a few years ago about a $15/hour minimum wage for fast food workers, Wendy's said, okay, we're just going to develop self-ordering kiosks and get rid of as many human workers as we can. Wendy's is rolling them out this year.

The minimum wage for robots is $0.00/hour. Robots don't get overtime pay. Robots don't get sick, don't have babies, don't go out on FMLA leave. Robots don't take vacations. Robots don't unionize. Robots don't need medical insurance or a 401(k). The only costs are the initial building and implementing costs, and service/maintenance costs after that.

Companies like McDonald's and Wendy's, and pretty much every other company, only care about keeping costs down and maximizing profits for the owners of the company. That's how business works; that's why people create businesses, to make money, to make a profit for themselves.

Of course, as the consumer, you can always choose to buy food or products from companies that like using humans. (It feels strange writing that.) You will be paying more, but that will be your choice, provided those businesses survive.

So it's a scary time, but make no mistake, the change has started. I don't know what the future will look like, but workplaces will be much different than they are today. If you want a job in the future, it has to be a job that can't be replaced with a robot. Humans with computer, programming, coding, skills should be important, going forward, and that's what I tell my kids to study.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Insurance Companies Trying to Gag Superstorm Sandy Victims?

As reported in several news articles ( this one  is free), in the aftermath of superstorm Sandy, engineering firms were hired by insurance companies to inspect the homes of people making claims for flood damage.  There have been allegations that two of the engineering firms, U.S. Forensic out of Louisiana, and GEB HiRise out of Uniondale, forged property damage reports in order to deny claims. The NY State Attorney General is investigating those allegations and wants to talk to the homeowners.  At the same time, there are about 1,800 lawsuits in federal court involving the insurance coverage claims. A three-judge panel is trying to expedite resolution of the cases.  Last week it was revealed that one of the insurance companies, The Standard Fire Insurance Company, which is a subsidiary of Travelers Insurance, drafted language in a settlement document saying that any homeowner who accepts a payout of their claims cannot cooperate with the criminal invest...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Germanwings Tragedy and Claims for Negligent Retention

There has been a lot of news about the terrible crash of Germanwings Flight 9525, which resulted in the death of 150 people when the co-pilot, Andreas Lubitz, (apparently) intentionally crashed the plane into the French Alps. Reports are that Lubitz had suicidal tendencies and had been declared medically unfit to fly . What may soon follow are lawsuits against Germanwings and Lufthansa (which owns Germanwings) for claims similar to what New York calls "negligent retention": A claim for negligent supervision or retention arises when an employer places an employee in a position to cause foreseeable harm, harm which the injured party most probably would have been spared had the employer taken reasonable care in supervising or retaining the employee. Vione v. Tewell,  12 Mic.3d 973, 979, 820 N.Y.S.2d 682 (Sup.Ct., New York County, 2006). Under New York law, a claim for negligent hiring, supervision or retention, "in addition to the standard elements of negligence,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Consumer Fraud: Dog "Rescue" Operation Shut Down and Ordered to Pay Restitution

News 12 recently had a story  about a Calverton dog "rescue" operation that was shut down and ordered to repay $24,000 in restitution for "selling" sick dogs. This was a type of fraud on consumers. The allegations  were that the two women who operated Precious Pups Rescue "pulled"/obtained dogs that had health issues from in-state and out-of-state shelters, then sold the dogs to consumers by way of "adoption fees" or "donations" of $200 to $600 per dog. The owners of Precious Pups Rescue told consumers that the dogs were healthy  and had been checked out by a vet when that was not true. The new owners were then faced with thousands of dollars in vet bills: Zambito and Torrillo-Hooghkirk sold consumers dogs that they claimed were healthy, vaccinated, spayed or neutered, and evaluated by a veterinarian, when in fact, they were not. In fact, the dogs had visible signs of illness, such as coughing, scratching, matting and sores. After...
Post a Comment
Read more