Skip to main content

Insurance Coverage is Affirmed for Owner Because of My Work

On April 22, 2015, the Second Department appeals court issued a decision affirming a lower court decision that a landowner was entitled to (1) defense [i.e. payment of legal fees] and (2) indemnification [the insurance company has to cover a judgment] in a wrongful death case. I was the lead attorney on that case.

The lawsuit was related the tragic case where a young man, Amir Zeqiri, was working at a Dunkin Donuts at a strip mall in Smithtown. Around 9:00 PM on February 28, 2010, he was taking out trash to dumpsters located behind the building when he fell into a cesspool (technically a leaching pool) and drowned a short time after that.

The strip mall owner's insurance company was put on notice of the accident. But it turned out the insurance policy had an exclusion that the insurance company would not cover accidents occurring in the "parking lot" of the building. So, the insurance company sued the landowner in what is called a declaratory judgment action, trying to get out of having to provide coverage for the accident.

The owner contacted a law office that I was doing of counsel work for at the time, and we had to defend the owner to get him insurance coverage. I was the lead attorney and did by far the vast majority of investigation, research, and motion writing on the case.

I was able to successfully argue that no, the accident did not happen in a parking lot. The accident/death happened in the leaching pool; the leaching pool is related to the functioning of the building; and accidents related to the functioning of the building were covered under the policy--whether the area behind the building is considered a "parking lot" or not. The appeals court agreed.

I had to learn a lot about how commercial septic systems work, and the key document in the case was the detailed affidavit I drafted in consultation with septic system expert Vicent A. Gaudiello in Water Mill, who is excellent.

The outcome was good. It was good for the landowner, and it was good for the family of Amir Zeqiri in the separate wrongful death case because there is now insurance coverage for any possible judgment against the owner.

If you are a business owner, and your insurance company is refusing to cover a claim for you, contact The Law Office of Greg Curry at (516) 252-9500.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Insurance Companies Trying to Gag Superstorm Sandy Victims?

As reported in several news articles ( this one  is free), in the aftermath of superstorm Sandy, engineering firms were hired by insurance companies to inspect the homes of people making claims for flood damage.  There have been allegations that two of the engineering firms, U.S. Forensic out of Louisiana, and GEB HiRise out of Uniondale, forged property damage reports in order to deny claims. The NY State Attorney General is investigating those allegations and wants to talk to the homeowners.  At the same time, there are about 1,800 lawsuits in federal court involving the insurance coverage claims. A three-judge panel is trying to expedite resolution of the cases.  Last week it was revealed that one of the insurance companies, The Standard Fire Insurance Company, which is a subsidiary of Travelers Insurance, drafted language in a settlement document saying that any homeowner who accepts a payout of their claims cannot cooperate with the criminal invest...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recent Cases: Appeals Court Reverses Lower Court in Slip and Fall

In a decision issued on March 18, 2015 , a New York appeals court reversed a lower court decision dismissing a slip and fall case. The plaintiff was a 12-year-old boy. He was injured when he slipped and fell on "loose and broken pieces of asphalt" as he was running towards an ice cream truck near an Ikea store in Brooklyn. There were two interesting things about the decision. First, like many slip and fall cases, the case turned on constructive notice--how long was the loose/broken asphalt on the ground before the accident so that the defendants should have seen it and corrected the dangerous condition? The appeals court said the defendants failed to show when they last cleaned or inspected the area, so they did not establish lack of constructive notice. The more interesting thing is that apparently the boy told staff at the hospital where he was taken that he tripped over his shoelaces. The defendants found this in the hospital records and basically said, "Ha! He di...
Post a Comment
Read more

Consumer Law Update: FTC sues DIRECTV for Deceptive Business Practices

I'm sure most people think that "of course" big businesses are constantly, intentionally, ripping people off and are engaged in deceptive business practices. As a lawyer, my inclination is I can't believe a big business, with lots of executives and lots of lawyers looking things over, could possibly offer promos or services that are so misleading or deceptive that they are illegal. They can't possibly be that dumb. Sometimes I'm wrong. For instance, the Federal Trade Commission has sued DIRECTV in San Francisco federal court for engaging in deceptive and misleading business practices in violation of federal law. DIRECTV was telling consumers, hey, look at our low monthly rates and look at all the great stuff you get, come sign up with us! However, DIRECTV failed to adequately disclose that, oh, by the way, in order to get that great deal, you have to sign a two-year contract; those low rates are only good for the first year; your monthly bill could go ...
Post a Comment
Read more