Skip to main content

If Donald Trump (or Another Business) Fails to Pay You, Sue!

One of the stories in this election is the accusation by various people and companies that Donald Trump doesn't pay his bills, that Trump often "stiffs" companies he does business with.

A now-retired owner of a music store in New Jersey wrote an article for the Washington Post saying that in 1989 he had a contract to provide pianos to Trump's Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City. He said that he provided the pianos, but later the casino told him it was short on money, it couldn't pay the full $100,000, would he take $70,000?

This gentleman says he was forced to accept the $70,000, taking a loss of $30,000. He said he couldn't afford to hire a lawyer:
They would pay 70 percent of what they owed me. There was no negotiating. I didn’t know what to do — I couldn’t afford to sue the Trump corporation, and I needed money to pay my piano suppliers. So I took the $70,000. 
Well guess what? There are people who do business like that! There are people who do that in every deal they make. I've seen it. And if you think you've been wronged, you have to be prepared to pursue and vindicate your rights.

The gentleman says he could not afford a lawyer, but he could've afforded me. I would represent him at my (current) hourly rate of $200/hour. I would do only as much work as would make financial sense for the client. I would sit down with him and say we can do a, b, and c, and it will cost this much money, or we can do x, y, and z, and it will cost that much money, what do you want to do?

Or maybe I would've looked at the facts and said this is the kind of case I'll take on contingency (1/3 of any eventual recovery).

Or maybe the case could've settled after a few letters between lawyers, and no lawsuit would ever have to be filed. That often happens. When businesses get letters from lawyers, they tend to realize things are serious.

Whether Trump has a habit of this or not, I don't know. But it does happen. People and businesses breach contracts every day. If you feel like you are on the losing side of a bad deal, contact me, and we'll talk about it.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Being Fired for Things an Employee Did On Their Own Time, Outside of Work: Legal or Not?

New York is an "at will" employment state, meaning that, in the absence of a contract, you can be fired at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all, unless the reason is based on something like age, race, religion, disability, etc. (just a handful of categories). (Government employees have more protections than private-sector employees, such as First Amendment protections.) One of the few exceptions to the at-will employment rule is New York Labor Law §201-d. The statute is lengthy and has lots of caveats and qualifiers and defenses (for the employer). But the gist of § 201-d is that an employee can't be disciplined or fired (or not hired) for something they do on their own time, away from work, that is legal, and that is not against the employer's interests.  The statute and the reported cases mostly deal with "recreational" and "political" activities, and the cases can turn on whether something was a "recreational activity...
Post a Comment
Read more

Insurance Companies Trying to Gag Superstorm Sandy Victims?

As reported in several news articles ( this one  is free), in the aftermath of superstorm Sandy, engineering firms were hired by insurance companies to inspect the homes of people making claims for flood damage.  There have been allegations that two of the engineering firms, U.S. Forensic out of Louisiana, and GEB HiRise out of Uniondale, forged property damage reports in order to deny claims. The NY State Attorney General is investigating those allegations and wants to talk to the homeowners.  At the same time, there are about 1,800 lawsuits in federal court involving the insurance coverage claims. A three-judge panel is trying to expedite resolution of the cases.  Last week it was revealed that one of the insurance companies, The Standard Fire Insurance Company, which is a subsidiary of Travelers Insurance, drafted language in a settlement document saying that any homeowner who accepts a payout of their claims cannot cooperate with the criminal invest...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recent Case Developments: Court Finds Breach of Contract of Oral Agreement/Loan

In November, 2014, plaintiff and defendant agreed that the plaintiff would loan the defendant $200,000, and the defendant would pay him back in 4 installments of $50,000 over the next year. The defendant made the first 3 payments (totaling $150,000), but not the last payment. The plaintiff then sued for breach of contract for the remaining $50,000. There was nothing in writing, just an oral agreement. It appears that as soon as the defendant served his "Answer" to the "Complaint", the plaintiff moved for summary judgment (a kind of mini-trial on paper). The evidence included the cancelled check for $200,000 and the records of payments totaling $150,000. The appeals court held that, although there was nothing in writing, the oral agreement was enforceable as a contract and held that the plaintiff had proven his breach of contract claim.  The defendant had argued it was too early in the case to decide such a motion, that more evidence needed to be gathered (called...
Post a Comment
Read more