Skip to main content

If Donald Trump (or Another Business) Fails to Pay You, Sue!

One of the stories in this election is the accusation by various people and companies that Donald Trump doesn't pay his bills, that Trump often "stiffs" companies he does business with.

A now-retired owner of a music store in New Jersey wrote an article for the Washington Post saying that in 1989 he had a contract to provide pianos to Trump's Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City. He said that he provided the pianos, but later the casino told him it was short on money, it couldn't pay the full $100,000, would he take $70,000?

This gentleman says he was forced to accept the $70,000, taking a loss of $30,000. He said he couldn't afford to hire a lawyer:
They would pay 70 percent of what they owed me. There was no negotiating. I didn’t know what to do — I couldn’t afford to sue the Trump corporation, and I needed money to pay my piano suppliers. So I took the $70,000. 
Well guess what? There are people who do business like that! There are people who do that in every deal they make. I've seen it. And if you think you've been wronged, you have to be prepared to pursue and vindicate your rights.

The gentleman says he could not afford a lawyer, but he could've afforded me. I would represent him at my (current) hourly rate of $200/hour. I would do only as much work as would make financial sense for the client. I would sit down with him and say we can do a, b, and c, and it will cost this much money, or we can do x, y, and z, and it will cost that much money, what do you want to do?

Or maybe I would've looked at the facts and said this is the kind of case I'll take on contingency (1/3 of any eventual recovery).

Or maybe the case could've settled after a few letters between lawyers, and no lawsuit would ever have to be filed. That often happens. When businesses get letters from lawyers, they tend to realize things are serious.

Whether Trump has a habit of this or not, I don't know. But it does happen. People and businesses breach contracts every day. If you feel like you are on the losing side of a bad deal, contact me, and we'll talk about it.


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Being Fired for Things an Employee Did On Their Own Time, Outside of Work: Legal or Not?

New York is an "at will" employment state, meaning that, in the absence of a contract, you can be fired at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all, unless the reason is based on something like age, race, religion, disability, etc. (just a handful of categories). (Government employees have more protections than private-sector employees, such as First Amendment protections.) One of the few exceptions to the at-will employment rule is New York Labor Law §201-d. The statute is lengthy and has lots of caveats and qualifiers and defenses (for the employer). But the gist of § 201-d is that an employee can't be disciplined or fired (or not hired) for something they do on their own time, away from work, that is legal, and that is not against the employer's interests.  The statute and the reported cases mostly deal with "recreational" and "political" activities, and the cases can turn on whether something was a "recreational activity...
Post a Comment
Read more

Insurance Companies Trying to Gag Superstorm Sandy Victims?

As reported in several news articles ( this one  is free), in the aftermath of superstorm Sandy, engineering firms were hired by insurance companies to inspect the homes of people making claims for flood damage.  There have been allegations that two of the engineering firms, U.S. Forensic out of Louisiana, and GEB HiRise out of Uniondale, forged property damage reports in order to deny claims. The NY State Attorney General is investigating those allegations and wants to talk to the homeowners.  At the same time, there are about 1,800 lawsuits in federal court involving the insurance coverage claims. A three-judge panel is trying to expedite resolution of the cases.  Last week it was revealed that one of the insurance companies, The Standard Fire Insurance Company, which is a subsidiary of Travelers Insurance, drafted language in a settlement document saying that any homeowner who accepts a payout of their claims cannot cooperate with the criminal invest...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recent Case Developments: Contractor Entitled to be Paid For Extra Work Not Part of Original Contract

On September 12, 2013, the Town of Kent (Putnam County) entered into a contract with a contractor to build a sewer.  During construction, certain "conditions that were unexpected and unanticipated" arose, requiring the contractor to do "extra" work--things beyond the scope of work of the original contract. (The appeals court doesn't detail what this extra work was.) The contractor performed the extra work, totaling around $380,000 in additional costs. For reasons not stated by the appeals court, the Town refused to pay for this extra work, and the contractor eventually sued the Town in May, 2015.  The contractor moved for summary judgment in the lower court (a kind of mini-trial on paper), and the court awarded judgment in favor of the contractor for the $380,000.  The Town appealed, but the appeals court sided with the contractor, saying that even though this "extra" work was not within the scope of work of the original contract, the con...
Post a Comment
Read more