Skip to main content

Insurance Coverage is Affirmed for Owner Because of My Work

On April 22, 2015, the Second Department appeals court issued a decision affirming a lower court decision that a landowner was entitled to (1) defense [i.e. payment of legal fees] and (2) indemnification [the insurance company has to cover a judgment] in a wrongful death case. I was the lead attorney on that case.

The lawsuit was related the tragic case where a young man, Amir Zeqiri, was working at a Dunkin Donuts at a strip mall in Smithtown. Around 9:00 PM on February 28, 2010, he was taking out trash to dumpsters located behind the building when he fell into a cesspool (technically a leaching pool) and drowned a short time after that.

The strip mall owner's insurance company was put on notice of the accident. But it turned out the insurance policy had an exclusion that the insurance company would not cover accidents occurring in the "parking lot" of the building. So, the insurance company sued the landowner in what is called a declaratory judgment action, trying to get out of having to provide coverage for the accident.

The owner contacted a law office that I was doing of counsel work for at the time, and we had to defend the owner to get him insurance coverage. I was the lead attorney and did by far the vast majority of investigation, research, and motion writing on the case.

I was able to successfully argue that no, the accident did not happen in a parking lot. The accident/death happened in the leaching pool; the leaching pool is related to the functioning of the building; and accidents related to the functioning of the building were covered under the policy--whether the area behind the building is considered a "parking lot" or not. The appeals court agreed.

I had to learn a lot about how commercial septic systems work, and the key document in the case was the detailed affidavit I drafted in consultation with septic system expert Vicent A. Gaudiello in Water Mill, who is excellent.

The outcome was good. It was good for the landowner, and it was good for the family of Amir Zeqiri in the separate wrongful death case because there is now insurance coverage for any possible judgment against the owner.

If you are a business owner, and your insurance company is refusing to cover a claim for you, contact The Law Office of Greg Curry at (516) 252-9500.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Being Fired for Things an Employee Did On Their Own Time, Outside of Work: Legal or Not?

New York is an "at will" employment state, meaning that, in the absence of a contract, you can be fired at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all, unless the reason is based on something like age, race, religion, disability, etc. (just a handful of categories). (Government employees have more protections than private-sector employees, such as First Amendment protections.) One of the few exceptions to the at-will employment rule is New York Labor Law §201-d. The statute is lengthy and has lots of caveats and qualifiers and defenses (for the employer). But the gist of § 201-d is that an employee can't be disciplined or fired (or not hired) for something they do on their own time, away from work, that is legal, and that is not against the employer's interests.  The statute and the reported cases mostly deal with "recreational" and "political" activities, and the cases can turn on whether something was a "recreational activity...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recent Case Developments: Employment Contract Enforceable Against Employer Even Though Not Signed

The plaintiff is a modeling scout. Defendant modeling agency decided to hire him as a modeling scout for $190,000/year, plus bonuses. An employment contract was prepared. One provision of the contact said that if the plaintiff were ever fired without cause, he would be entitled to 6-months severance ($95,000). The contract also said that it could be signed in counterparts. The plaintiff signed the contract on August 18, 2015 and emailed his signature to the modeling agency. One of the agency's board members emailed back, saying "Welcome aboard. We'll countersign over the next few days." But no one from the agency ever signed the contract. Nevertheless, the plaintiff began working as a modeling scout, and the agency paid him according to the contract. But after six months, the agency decided to terminate him, without cause. The agency then refused to pay him the $95,000 severance, and the plaintiff brought a lawsuit for breach of contract. The modeling agency m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recent Case Developments: Contractor Entitled to be Paid For Extra Work Not Part of Original Contract

On September 12, 2013, the Town of Kent (Putnam County) entered into a contract with a contractor to build a sewer.  During construction, certain "conditions that were unexpected and unanticipated" arose, requiring the contractor to do "extra" work--things beyond the scope of work of the original contract. (The appeals court doesn't detail what this extra work was.) The contractor performed the extra work, totaling around $380,000 in additional costs. For reasons not stated by the appeals court, the Town refused to pay for this extra work, and the contractor eventually sued the Town in May, 2015.  The contractor moved for summary judgment in the lower court (a kind of mini-trial on paper), and the court awarded judgment in favor of the contractor for the $380,000.  The Town appealed, but the appeals court sided with the contractor, saying that even though this "extra" work was not within the scope of work of the original contract, the con...
Post a Comment
Read more